![]() What do you think? Is reverse chronological “stream” still a valid design principle? or should we think differently? Leave a comment below, so I can learn from you. Yes, I have old faithful readers, but they too want to get the stuff emailed to them. These days, it is either newsletters or fly-by-visits that account for interaction on blogs. I felt that it was a way to showcase my whole “online being.” And that worked when people were in the habit of visiting blogs every day - even multiple times a day. The question is when will this flow down to individual websites, including blogs?Īs an old-school blogger, I have found a lot of comfort in the stream. Heavily visited large web publications such as The Verge, which found their start as “streams” are not using a non-stream-like user experience, and have found ways to combine the urgency of the stream with articles that need to stick around longer. As humans, our interests have become wide enough that we can at best peck at what’s flowing through. Social networks seem to have done a forensic analysis of content consumption behavior and have come to the conclusion that most of us can no longer follow the stream and make sense of what’s flowing through, or even catch what’s important. It is organized around what the machine thinks we need to see based on what we have seen in the past. It is more like a river that has been heavily dammed. Social networks are increasingly algorithmically organized, so their stream isn’t really a free-flowing stream. I often wonder, am I doing too much with this one place? Does the “stream” as an organizing principle even make sense in an information-dense and diverse world?Īcross the web, one can see “streams” losing their preeminence. In short, the diversity of information has increased. With the company’s shutdown in 2015, this website became a catch-all for everything, including technology-focused writing, interviews, and essays. Its primary function was to be a personal place - less about technology-focused writing and more about life and my obsessions. As years passed, the blog became a business, and I had to set up this website as a personal homestead. It was primarily technology-related blog posts - with an occasional personal blog post. ![]() What Ben is asking and I am echoing: are these end-days of using “stream” as a design and information organizing principle? It has been just over two decades that I have written “for” and published “to” the stream. If you look at my homepage with fresh eyes, my stream is a hodgepodge. It’s a genuine representation of what I’m reading and thinking about, and each post’s page looks fine to me, but it doesn’t quite hold together as a whole. Bonus: RSSįinally, if you’re looking for a more general reading solution, check out our guide to the best RSS reader apps, which allow you to follow your favorite news sources and blogs from all over in a single repository.As of right now, the homepage is a mix of long-form posts, short thoughts, and links I consider interesting, presented as a stream. Plus everything just works a little better than the web app. It’s easy to follow writers you enjoy, notifications can be set up so you never miss a post, and Medium’s discovery algorithm does a good job of recommending further reading. It’s used by paid journalists and independent writers alike and covers a huge range of topics.īest way to read? Medium’s official app isn’t the best option for writers, but stick to reading and it’s a more refined experience than the website – although the layout of the two is very similar. What is it? Perhaps the largest example of social journalism, Medium allows anyone to publish individual blog posts. But the real benefit of using an app over the basic Wikipedia website is the easy discoverability of interesting items and the facility to bookmark your own favorites. Navigation is quick, articles look great, and there’s a gorgeous location-based search you won’t find elsewhere. It combines the superb typography found in real-world books with the smarts available in a digital interface. There are several good Wikipedia-readers out there, but V has a premium, hand-crafted feel we really dig.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |